# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeApr 24th 2010
• (edited Apr 24th 2010)

added a new Examples-section Integral versus real cohomology to fiber sequence

(and renamed the original fibration sequence and made it a redirect to that – but the cache bug is in the way,as usual).

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010

added a detailed proof of how homotopy fibers of oo-functor categories are computed in terms of over-categories.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
• (edited May 3rd 2010)

if you think about it, the proof I just mentioned is the full-fledged version of the proof that we sketched previously in the section In terms of sections at twisted cohomology. I have added some more sentences to this effect now.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 4th 2010

added an Examples section on how equivalences are characterized by having contractible homotopy fibers

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorTim_Porter
• CommentTimeNov 25th 2013
• (edited Nov 25th 2013)

The last reference in the fiber sequence entry has now been published. I have updated the entry. The previous title at this point was wrong by the way. It did not correspond to the paper to which the link refered. I hope this is now correct.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorTim_Porter
• CommentTimeMar 20th 2014

An Anonymous has made changes to fiber sequence in the section on Mayer-Vietoris. I do not understand their point. They did change something to $A\times C$, but from the pullback this should be $A\times B$ and … in other words the entry seems to be a mess at this point (glancing at it). The diagram is wrong as well. There are several ways to fix it, but I am not sure which is intended.

• CommentRowNumber7.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMar 20th 2014
• (edited Mar 20th 2014)

Thanks for the alert. I have fixed it now (here), both the original diagram as well as the fiber sequence afterwards, exchanging Bs for Cs.

I suppose somebody saw the typo, kindly went to fix it, but then didn’t exactly.

• CommentRowNumber8.
• CommentAuthorTim_Porter
• CommentTimeMar 20th 2014

That is what I suspected.