Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 24th 2010
    • (edited Apr 24th 2010)

    added a new Examples-section Integral versus real cohomology to fiber sequence

    (and renamed the original fibration sequence and made it a redirect to that – but the cache bug is in the way,as usual).

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010

    added a detailed proof of how homotopy fibers of oo-functor categories are computed in terms of over-categories.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
    • (edited May 3rd 2010)

    if you think about it, the proof I just mentioned is the full-fledged version of the proof that we sketched previously in the section In terms of sections at twisted cohomology. I have added some more sentences to this effect now.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 4th 2010

    added an Examples section on how equivalences are characterized by having contractible homotopy fibers

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeNov 25th 2013
    • (edited Nov 25th 2013)

    The last reference in the fiber sequence entry has now been published. I have updated the entry. The previous title at this point was wrong by the way. It did not correspond to the paper to which the link refered. I hope this is now correct.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014

    An Anonymous has made changes to fiber sequence in the section on Mayer-Vietoris. I do not understand their point. They did change something to A×CA\times C, but from the pullback this should be A×BA\times B and … in other words the entry seems to be a mess at this point (glancing at it). The diagram is wrong as well. There are several ways to fix it, but I am not sure which is intended.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014
    • (edited Mar 20th 2014)

    Thanks for the alert. I have fixed it now (here), both the original diagram as well as the fiber sequence afterwards, exchanging Bs for Cs.

    I suppose somebody saw the typo, kindly went to fix it, but then didn’t exactly.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014

    That is what I suspected.