Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011
   • (edited Jan 8th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexthere is a very friendly user signing as "Anonymous Coward" who looks after entries of which I have announced edits here and fixes typos. Whoever this is, I appreciate it a lot, but I have one plea: it happens very frequently that I click "edit" among one of the set of entries that I am currently working on and the software alerts me > Anonymous Coward has been editing this entry for 24 minutes. Do you want to edit anyway? Originally when this happened I clicked "Cancel", went to brew a coffee and then came back. But more often than not, it would then say > Anonymous Coward has been editing this entry for 43 minutes. Do you want to edit anyway? And so on. So I would keep trying and at some point the block would disappear. More often than not I would curiously check the entry for all the new edit that were made anonymously in the last hour ... only to find often that there were no edits at all. After this happened a few times, and after I did see some helpful edits _do_ appear every now and then, I figured what was going on was probably this: the kind anonymous user would use the "edit" button to look at the source code, but often decide that no edits were necessary anyway and turn to the next entry... without however hitting "Cancel". That leaves the entry blocked then. Therefore I would like to ask this anonymous user (and everybody else): 1. if you just want to see the source code of an entry and not edit it, don't hit "edit". Instead, hit "source". 1. If you did hit "edit" and decide not to edit anything after all, please don't forget to hit "Cancel" before you leave. Thanks!

   there is a very friendly user signing as “Anonymous Coward” who looks after entries of which I have announced edits here and fixes typos. Whoever this is, I appreciate it a lot, but I have one plea:

   it happens very frequently that I click “edit” among one of the set of entries that I am currently working on and the software alerts me

   Anonymous Coward has been editing this entry for 24 minutes. Do you want to edit anyway?

   Originally when this happened I clicked “Cancel”, went to brew a coffee and then came back. But more often than not, it would then say

   Anonymous Coward has been editing this entry for 43 minutes. Do you want to edit anyway?

   And so on. So I would keep trying and at some point the block would disappear. More often than not I would curiously check the entry for all the new edit that were made anonymously in the last hour … only to find often that there were no edits at all.

   After this happened a few times, and after I did see some helpful edits do appear every now and then, I figured what was going on was probably this:

   the kind anonymous user would use the “edit” button to look at the source code, but often decide that no edits were necessary anyway and turn to the next entry… without however hitting “Cancel”. That leaves the entry blocked then.

   Therefore I would like to ask this anonymous user (and everybody else):

   1. if you just want to see the source code of an entry and not edit it, don’t hit “edit”. Instead, hit “source”.

   2. If you did hit “edit” and decide not to edit anything after all, please don’t forget to hit “Cancel” before you leave.

   Thanks!

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJan 8th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexAlso, it really is nice if you sign your full name and use it to make a page on yourself. But this is optional; we are grateful for your helpful edits in any case!

   Also, it really is nice if you sign your full name and use it to make a page on yourself. But this is optional; we are grateful for your helpful edits in any case!