Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014

    Over at Monster group, I wrote out a description via a group presentation. Of course, it makes no pretense to be illuminating (although it is well-known to experts like Conway; it’s probably in his book with Sloane on the Leech lattice and sphere packings).

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014
    • (edited May 2nd 2014)

    Thanks, Todd!

    Is there any way to see at an ever so rough level why that construction should give the largest sporadic finite simple group?

    Or else, might you have any other hints that would go towards indicating why that construction is what it is?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014

    Mainly I just wanted to get something precise put down. It should be clear to everyone that I am not even close to being an expert, but I was reading some stuff last night on Conway’s description of the Monster which looked sort of related, and with luck I could transcribe some of that. I will try to see about that a little later.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014

    Thanks. Sure, I understand. I was just wondering if you might have some inkling of how it comes about.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014

    David Roberts’ query on the page is talking about this Cafe post. I don’t think there’s anything concrete to say in response.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2014

    Something more concrete from here.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2014

    I think I just wanted the page to link to that nCafé discussion, but couldn’t find it at the time (and forgot about the query).

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2014
    • (edited May 3rd 2014)

    I’ve converted my question into a paragraph with the links David C supplied.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2014

    Regarding the Y-group presentation of the monster: I didn’t find the energy to attempt to summarize what’s behind it, but I did enter a brief paragraph and added some relevant references.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 17th 2019

    added a sentence connecting to automorphisms of the Monster VOA (here)

    diff, v18, current

  1. H4 of the Monster

    Ammar Husain

    diff, v20, current