Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexMerged the page equivariant with this one. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/equivariance/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/equivariance/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariance">current</a>

   Merged the page equivariant with this one.

   diff, v3, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2018
   • (edited Jul 6th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexI must be very dim, but I can't follow [Merging](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/HowTo#merging) to make that work. It doesn't seem to want to change the name to 'equivariant > history'.

   I must be very dim, but I can’t follow Merging to make that work. It doesn’t seem to want to change the name to ’equivariant > history’.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexIs there a reason why [[equivariant homotopy theory]] and related topics are not mentioned in [[equivariance]]?

   Is there a reason why equivariant homotopy theory and related topics are not mentioned in equivariance?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat would you do if the answer were "Yes"?

   What would you do if the answer were “Yes”?

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2018
   • (edited Jul 5th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexGood question? It might depend on the reason given. There are entries whose links to physics make me think that because of a change in viewpoint from maths to physics, there should be an entry pointing out the difference in usage, and in that case an entry doing that is more useful than just adding a link. It should also be said that I sometimes do not feel that I understand the reason fully so as to word such a page sensibly. On the other hand in this particular case, to me there is a big entry on equivariant homotopy theory and yet no link to it or from it to [[equivariance]], and my question in #3 was out of curiosity. (I am also working on some equivariant homotopy theory stuff at the moment so .... ) Glad there is not a link. I will probably add some more!

   Good question? It might depend on the reason given. There are entries whose links to physics make me think that because of a change in viewpoint from maths to physics, there should be an entry pointing out the difference in usage, and in that case an entry doing that is more useful than just adding a link. It should also be said that I sometimes do not feel that I understand the reason fully so as to word such a page sensibly. On the other hand in this particular case, to me there is a big entry on equivariant homotopy theory and yet no link to it or from it to equivariance, and my question in #3 was out of curiosity. (I am also working on some equivariant homotopy theory stuff at the moment so …. ) Glad there is not a link. I will probably add some more!