Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeAug 15th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI moved [[extended natural number system]] to [[extended natural number]] and expanded it. In particular, it's now a good place to link to if you want to say that an $n$-concept from higher category theory makes sense "for any [[extended natural number]] $n$".

   I moved extended natural number system to extended natural number and expanded it. In particular, it’s now a good place to link to if you want to say that an $n$-concept from higher category theory makes sense “for any extended natural number $n$”.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeAug 16th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexSo we could say decategorification and looping (as decribed in [Categorification](http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9802029))) send $n$-categories to $pred(n)$-categories for all extended natural numbers (having tidied up numbering at the lower end and doing what is necessary to allow $\ast$-categories to be images of $(-2)$-categories).

   So we could say decategorification and looping (as decribed in Categorification)) send $n$-categories to $pred(n)$-categories for all extended natural numbers (having tidied up numbering at the lower end and doing what is necessary to allow $\ast$-categories to be images of $(-2)$-categories).

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexYes! (And looping makes a monoidal $pred(n)$-category.)

   Yes! (And looping makes a monoidal $pred(n)$-category.)

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI have a query on the page about the embedding in $\mathbb{R}$, because even though I made a small fix, I still don't think I got it right.

   I have a query on the page about the embedding in $\mathbb{R}$, because even though I made a small fix, I still don’t think I got it right.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItex@David C. 2: That's a nice way to put it! I don't know if I put together before the facts that the ordinary natural numbers are the well-founded objects in the extended natural numbers (the inductive type sitting inside the coinductive type), whereas $n$-categories are conveniently defined inductively for finite $n$ and coinductively for infinite $n$.

   @David C. 2: That’s a nice way to put it! I don’t know if I put together before the facts that the ordinary natural numbers are the well-founded objects in the extended natural numbers (the inductive type sitting inside the coinductive type), whereas $n$-categories are conveniently defined inductively for finite $n$ and coinductively for infinite $n$.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
   • (edited Aug 17th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItex@DR Yes, there was supposed to be $x_i$ in there; I've fixed it. (I also divided by $2$ twice for some reason.) The crazy way that it looked before is another itex "feature".

   @DR

   Yes, there was supposed to be $x_i$ in there; I’ve fixed it. (I also divided by $2$ twice for some reason.)

   The crazy way that it looked before is another itex “feature”.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorColin Tan
   • CommentTimeNov 27th 2018
   • (edited Nov 27th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Colin Tan
   Format: MarkdownItexShould the extended natural numbers start with $1$ instead? It is written in the section on universal property, "You can think of $corec_S p$ as mapping an element $a$ of $S$ to the number of times that $p$ must be applied in succession, starting from $a$, before being taken out of $S$." In particular, if $p(a) = *$ is undefined, so $p$ must be applied $1$ time before being taken out of $S$, so $\corec_S p(a)$ should be equal to $1$, right? So it seems that $\corec_S$ takes values $1, 2, \dots$ or $\infty$.

   Should the extended natural numbers start with $1$ instead? It is written in the section on universal property, “You can think of $corec_S p$ as mapping an element $a$ of $S$ to the number of times that $p$ must be applied in succession, starting from $a$, before being taken out of $S$.” In particular, if $p(a) = *$ is undefined, so $p$ must be applied $1$ time before being taken out of $S$, so $\corec_S p(a)$ should be equal to $1$, right?

   So it seems that $\corec_S$ takes values $1, 2, \dots$ or $\infty$.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeNov 27th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexOr redefine so that the number counts the times that $p$ can be applied while staying within $S$.

   Or redefine so that the number counts the times that $p$ can be applied while staying within $S$.

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 27th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI changed the wording to "the maximum number of times that $p$ can be applied in succession, starting from $a$, before being taken out of $S$" to keep 0. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/extended+natural+number/10">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/extended+natural+number/10">v10</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/extended+natural+number">current</a>

   I changed the wording to “the maximum number of times that $p$ can be applied in succession, starting from $a$, before being taken out of $S$” to keep 0.

   diff, v10, current

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeNov 28th 2018
    • (edited Nov 28th 2018)
    • PermaLink
    Author: Richard Williamson
    Format: MarkdownItex[Administrative note: comments #1 - #8 originally belonged to a Latest Changes thread entitled 'Extended natural numbers'. The edit announcer does not know about page name changes that were made before it came into existence, so I have manually merged that thread with this one. I also deleted a one sentence comment of Mike's in the old thread which basically just alerted to the fact that the edit announcer had used this thread. ]

    [Administrative note: comments #1 - #8 originally belonged to a Latest Changes thread entitled ’Extended natural numbers’. The edit announcer does not know about page name changes that were made before it came into existence, so I have manually merged that thread with this one. I also deleted a one sentence comment of Mike’s in the old thread which basically just alerted to the fact that the edit announcer had used this thread. ]

11. • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorColin Tan
    • CommentTimeNov 28th 2018
    • PermaLink
    Author: Colin Tan
    Format: MarkdownItexIn that sense, the set of extended natural numbers is a decategorification of the category of countable sets. Identify $0$ with the empty set, $1$ with a singleton, ..., $\infty$ with a countable set. And $p$ identifies with the operation of taking the complement of a singleton in a set. Eg $p(\emptyset)$ is undefined, $p(\{0\}) = \{0\} \setminus \{0\} = \emptyset$ is empty, $p(\{0, 1\}) = \{0, 1\} \setminus \{1\} = \{1\}$ is a singleton, ... and $p(\{0, 1, 2, ... \}) = \{0, 1, 2, ...\} \setminus \{0\} = \{1, 2, \dots\}$ is countable. So $\corec_S p(a)$ is the extended natural number identified with the subset of $\{p, p\circ p, p\circ p \circ p, \cdots \}$ containing those $p \circ \cdots \circ p$ that satisfy $(p \circ \cdots \circ p)(a) \in S$. Thanks for suggesting the change, David!

    In that sense, the set of extended natural numbers is a decategorification of the category of countable sets. Identify $0$ with the empty set, $1$ with a singleton, …, $\infty$ with a countable set. And $p$ identifies with the operation of taking the complement of a singleton in a set. Eg $p(\emptyset)$ is undefined, $p(\{0\}) = \{0\} \setminus \{0\} = \emptyset$ is empty, $p(\{0, 1\}) = \{0, 1\} \setminus \{1\} = \{1\}$ is a singleton, … and $p(\{0, 1, 2, ... \}) = \{0, 1, 2, ...\} \setminus \{0\} = \{1, 2, \dots\}$ is countable.

    So $\corec_S p(a)$ is the extended natural number identified with the subset of $\{p, p\circ p, p\circ p \circ p, \cdots \}$ containing those $p \circ \cdots \circ p$ that satisfy $(p \circ \cdots \circ p)(a) \in S$. Thanks for suggesting the change, David!

12. • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorVictor Sannier
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2023
    • PermaLink
    Author: Victor Sannier
    Format: MarkdownItexAdded redirections of conatural numbers, conat, conumber, etc. and wrote a section on formalisation in proof assistants <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/extended+natural+number/14">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/extended+natural+number/14">v14</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/extended+natural+number">current</a>

    Added redirections of conatural numbers, conat, conumber, etc. and wrote a section on formalisation in proof assistants

    diff, v14, current