Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • Page created, but author did not leave any comments.

      v1, current

    • brief category:people-entry for hyperlinking references

      v1, current

    • just a stub for the moment, in order to make links work

      v1, current

    • expanded (here) the remark on homotopy groups of Omega-spectra just a bit more

      diff, v7, current

    • Cited today’s preprint by Pradic-Brown showing that CSB is equivalent to LEM.

      diff, v30, current

    • noticed that the Idea-section at ring spectrum didn’t at all address the evident subtlety here. Have expanded now to make this clear.

    • Added Rainer Vogt’s file as a reference here as well.

      diff, v10, current

    • Finally made a page for the concept mentioned by Mike in a 2016 n-Café discussion.

      I’d be interested in examples that weren’t already relevance monoidal categories (ie, not symmetric).

      v1, current

    • I have added pointer to the second of Postnikov’s original articles on the matter:

      • M. M. Postnikov, Issledovaniya po gomotopičeskoĭ teorii nepreryvnyh otobraženiĭ. I. Algebraičeskaya teoriya sistem. II. Naturalʹnaya sistema i gomotopičeskiĭ tip. (Russian) [[_Investigations in homotopy theory of continuous mappings. I. The algebraic theory of systems. II. The natural system and homotopy type._]] Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. no. 46. Izdat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1955. (mathnet:tm1182)

      Is there any linkable online trace of Postnikov’s first article:

      • M. M. Postnikov, Determination of the homology groups of a space by means of the homotopy invariants, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 76: 359–362 (1951)

      ?

      diff, v53, current

    • fixed notation in the second formula in the proof of this Prop.:

      (The adjoined base point () +(-)_+ to the symmetric group factor was previously displayed below the formula beneath the underbrace below the symmetric group symbol that it really belonged to. And in the second line of that formula under the brace, the corresponding () +(-)_+ had been missing.)

      diff, v56, current

    • coming here to add “selected writings”, I have adjusted/updated the wording a little

      diff, v17, current

    • I added a reference to a paper of mine

      Amnon Yekutieli

      diff, v48, current

    • have expanded the list of “Selected writings”: more entries, more complete bib-info

      diff, v3, current

    • have been expanding the list of examples slightly

      diff, v6, current

    • a brief stub, to make links work

      v1, current

    • The cut rule for linear logic used to be stated as

      If ΓA\Gamma \vdash A and AΔA \vdash \Delta, then ΓΔ\Gamma \vdash \Delta.

      I don’t think this is general enough, so I corrected it to

      If ΓA,Φ\Gamma \vdash A, \Phi and Ψ,AΔ\Psi,A \vdash \Delta, then Ψ,ΓΔ,Φ\Psi,\Gamma \vdash \Delta,\Phi.

    • I have created a stub for this at Petri net. I hope to develop the links with higher dimensional automata and also with linear logic.

    • starting something, on Conner-Floyd’s (U,fr)(U,fr)-bordism theory

      v1, current